Skip to content
Compare · Video conferencing

Google Meet vs Microsoft Teams

Side by side on the dimensions that decide it. The 8020 Score already weighs these — this is the receipts.

8020 PickGoogle Meet
Google Meet
Video conferencing
91/100
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Video conferencing
91/100
TierEssentialEssential
Value for money90
92
Depth & power93
92
Time to results96
95
Ecosystem98
97
Free tierYesYes
Starting priceCustom$4/user/mo
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Integrations66
View profileView profile
TL
The bottom line

Google Meet takes the 8020 pick on the composite score (91 vs 91). Microsoft Teams remains a credible choice when its specific strengths match your situation — the breakdown below explains where each one earns its tier.

The breakdown

Google Meet or Microsoft Teams — how to choose.

Google Meet and Microsoft Teams both sit in the video conferencing category, which is the first thing to note about this comparison: the head-to-head is about which tool earns the seat. On the 8020 rubric, Google Meet scores 91 against Microsoft Teams at 91. The gap is meaningful on some dimensions and narrow on others — the rest of this page explains exactly where.

What's the real difference between Google Meet and Microsoft Teams?

Google Meet is built for organizations already on google workspace. Microsoft Teams is built for organizations already paying for microsoft 365. The tools overlap on surface features but diverge on the workflow each is designed around — Google Meet optimises for browser-based meetings with no required app or account for guests, while Microsoft Teams optimises for video meetings for up to 1,000 interactive participants on enterprise plans.

Google Meet's positioning: Google Meet runs entirely in the browser and is bundled into Google Workspace, so guests join with one click and no install — the lowest-friction join experience of any meeting tool for organizations already on Google.

Microsoft Teams's positioning: Microsoft Teams comes bundled with Microsoft 365, so organizations already paying for Office get enterprise video conferencing, chat, and calling at no additional cost — a bundle economics advantage no standalone tool can match.

The 8020 rubric weighs four things — value for money (30%), depth and power (30%), time to results (25%), and ecosystem (15%). Google Meet scores 90/93/96/98 on those dimensions; Microsoft Teams scores 92/92/95/97. The biggest spread is on value for money — see the table above.

When should you pick Google Meet?

Pick Google Meet when organizations already on google workspace is the job that has to be done well. Its free tier covers organizations already on google workspace without a credit card, and the 8020 Score of 91 reflects how well it executes against its rubric.

Google Meet is the right call when:

  • Organizations already on Google Workspace.
  • Teams that want browser-based meetings with no app install.
  • Anyone needing quick calls scheduled straight from Google Calendar.
  • You want to evaluate it before committing budget — the free tier is real, not a teaser.
  • Your stack already includes one of the 6 platforms it integrates with.

Google Meet's standout capabilities — verified per the vendor's published specs (May 2026) — include browser-based meetings with no required app or account for guests, one-click scheduling from google calendar and joining from gmail, live captions and gemini-powered meeting notes and summaries. These are the features that earn the Essential tier on the rubric.

When should you pick Microsoft Teams?

Pick Microsoft Teams when organizations already paying for microsoft 365 is the job that has to be done well. Its free tier covers organizations already paying for microsoft 365 without a credit card, and the 8020 Score of 91 reflects how well it executes against its rubric.

Microsoft Teams is the right call when:

  • Organizations already paying for Microsoft 365.
  • Enterprises needing meetings, chat, and files in one governed app.
  • Teams that want video conferencing bundled rather than bought separately.
  • You want to evaluate it before committing budget — the free tier is real, not a teaser.
  • Your stack already includes one of the 6 platforms it integrates with.

Microsoft Teams's standout capabilities — verified per the vendor's published specs (May 2026) — include video meetings for up to 1,000 interactive participants on enterprise plans, persistent team and channel chat alongside one-to-one messaging, deep microsoft 365 integration with word, excel, powerpoint, and sharepoint. These are the features that earn the Essential tier on the rubric.

How much do Google Meet and Microsoft Teams cost?

Google Meet starts at custom enterprise pricing on a freemium (free tier + paid plans) model. Microsoft Teams starts at $4 per user per month on a freemium (free tier + paid plans) model. The two are priced comparably. Pricing verified May 2026.

Google Meet: Free tier available. Lowest paid plan: Custom. Pricing model: freemium (free tier + paid plans). Microsoft Teams: Free tier available. Lowest paid plan: $4/user/mo. Pricing model: freemium (free tier + paid plans).

Entry pricing only tells you where the meter starts. Real spend scales with seats, usage limits, and the plan tier where the features you actually need become available. Check each vendor's pricing page for the tier that matches your team size — and verify it matches our last-verified date before signing.

Google Meet — strengths and trade-offs

What Google Meet does well, where it falls short. Both lists draw from our hands-on testing against the Essential criteria. The full review is on the Google Meet profile.

Strengths
  • Runs in the browser — guests join with one click, no install
  • Bundled into Google Workspace at no extra per-meeting cost
  • Native Gmail and Calendar integration makes scheduling a single click
  • Gemini meeting notes and live captions included on supported plans
  • Reliable performance even on low-bandwidth connections
Trade-offs
  • Free tier caps group meetings at 60 minutes
  • Fewer host controls and webinar features than Zoom
  • Recording and larger meetings require a paid Workspace plan
  • Weak as a standalone purchase outside the Google ecosystem
  • No persistent team chat — it is a meeting tool, not a hub like Teams

Microsoft Teams — strengths and trade-offs

What Microsoft Teams does well, where it falls short. Both lists draw from our hands-on testing against the Essential criteria. The full review is on the Microsoft Teams profile.

Strengths
  • Effectively free for Microsoft 365 subscribers — no separate purchase
  • Combines chat, meetings, calling, and files in a single governed app
  • Tight integration with Office documents and SharePoint
  • Copilot summaries and recaps included on supported plans
  • Enterprise-grade compliance and admin controls
Trade-offs
  • Interface is heavy and slower than Zoom or Meet for quick calls
  • External guests hit more friction joining than they do on Zoom
  • Notifications and channel sprawl overwhelm large organizations
  • Standalone value is weak — the case rests on the Microsoft 365 bundle
  • Performance on older or non-Windows hardware lags competitors

What are the alternatives to Google Meet and Microsoft Teams?

If neither Google Meet nor Microsoft Teams is the right fit, the closest alternatives are the other tools in the video conferencing category. Both lists are ranked by 8020 Score — start with the top of the relevant category and work down.

Google Meet alternatives we cover: Zoom, Microsoft Teams.

Microsoft Teams alternatives we cover: Zoom, Google Meet.

Frequently asked questions

Is Google Meet or Microsoft Teams better overall?

Neither is strictly better — they serve different jobs. Google Meet takes the 8020 composite (91 vs 91) on the rubric, while Microsoft Teams earns its tier (Essential) when its specific strengths match your situation. The decision turns on the four dimensions in the table above.

How much do Google Meet and Microsoft Teams cost?

Google Meet starts at custom enterprise pricing on a freemium (free tier + paid plans) model; Microsoft Teams starts at $4 per user per month on a freemium (free tier + paid plans) model. Google Meet has a free tier; Microsoft Teams has a free tier. Pricing verified May 2026.

Does Google Meet integrate with the same tools as Microsoft Teams?

Google Meet lists 6 verified integrations in our directory; Microsoft Teams lists 6. Both connect to the major platforms most teams already use. Specific integration availability depends on plan tier — see each tool profile for the full integration list.

Can Google Meet replace Microsoft Teams?

Only if your use case maps to Google Meet's strengths. Google Meet runs entirely in the browser and is bundled into Google Workspace, so guests join with one click and no install — the lowest-friction join experience of any meeting too… If Microsoft Teams's specific job is your primary need, it earns its seat.

Which has the better free tier, Google Meet or Microsoft Teams?

Both Google Meet and Microsoft Teams ship a free tier. Google Meet's free tier suits organizations already on google workspace; Microsoft Teams's suits organizations already paying for microsoft 365. Specific limits are listed on each vendor's pricing page.